- The Continuing Resolution (CR) necessitates a pipeline rebalance away from speculative “new starts” and toward opportunities tied to existing programs, recompetes, and incumbent work, as agencies favor stability and preserving current services.
- CRs expose pipeline weaknesses and increase forecasting risk because they reshape awards (e.g., smaller task orders instead of large contracts) and require government contractors to actively adjust award dates and probabilities based on funding certainty, not just technical merit.
- Disciplined capture and data-backed prioritization are critical during a CR; firms should slow down early capture, apply stricter gate reviews, and use historical data to prioritize opportunities with a clear, funded path to maintain momentum while competitors hesitate.
The federal acquisition cycle rarely aligns perfectly with the strategic plans of government contractors. With the recent passage of the Continuing Resolution (CR) extending funding through January 30, 2026, the industry faces another period of fiscal ambiguity.
Here is an analysis of how this legislative delay impacts your 2025 pipeline and the strategic adjustments required to maintain momentum.
What Is a Continuing Resolution?
A Continuing Resolution is not a budget. It’s a temporary funding measure that allows the federal government to keep operating when full-year appropriations aren’t passed on time. Under a CR, agencies typically operate at prior-year funding levels and are restricted in how they can start new programs, shift funds, or make long-term commitments.
The Impact of “No New Starts”
If your Q1 and Q2 revenue forecasts rely heavily on “greenfield” opportunities (programs that did not exist in the prior fiscal year) your projections are at risk. For many executive teams, this may represent a disruption to revenue forecasting and resource allocation. However, seasoned government contractors understand that this is not a full stop; it is a signal to pivot.
Some of the recommended responses are:
- To Adjust Forecasts: Do not remove these opportunities from your pipeline, but do adjust their anticipated award dates to Q2 or Q3.
- To Qualify Funding Status: Scrutinize your pipeline for opportunities marked “Subject to Availability of Funds.” Prioritize capture efforts on requirements where the funding source is clear and already appropriated (e.g., multi-year funds), rather than those dependent on the new fiscal year’s budget.
The Need for Pipeline Rebalance
Beyond timing adjustments, the “no new starts” constraint should also trigger a deeper review of deal composition within your pipeline. Opportunities that depend on expanded scope, new mission areas, or first-time agency engagements face the highest risk of delay. In contrast, requirements tied to existing programs, extensions, or incremental capability improvements are far more likely to move forward under a CR.
For capture teams, this means shifting attention away from speculative pursuits and toward deals with continuity baked in. The objective is not to shrink the pipeline, but to rebalance it toward opportunities with a realistic funding path.
Recompetes and Incumbent Work Become More Valuable
Continuing Resolutions tend to favor stability. Agencies still need to operate, and that often means preserving existing services rather than launching new initiatives. As a result, recompetes and follow-on work take on outsized importance during a CR period.
If your organization is the incumbent, or a known performer, on a program approaching expiration, those opportunities deserve immediate focus. Agencies are incentivized to minimize disruption, which increases the likelihood that these procurements move forward even when broader budget clarity is lacking.
This also applies to task orders under existing IDIQs. Contracting officers frequently lean on established vehicles during CRs because they provide flexibility and faster execution. Firms that already hold relevant IDIQs are often better positioned than those waiting for new standalone awards.
Why Do CRs Distort Pipelines Instead of Freezing Them?
One of the most common misconceptions about Continuing Resolutions is that they “pause” contracting activity. In reality, CRs tend to reshape pipelines rather than stop them outright.
What changes is the form and timing of awards. Large, single-award contracts may be broken into smaller task orders. Periods of performance may shorten. Options may be exercised instead of recompeting full contracts. Requirements that once looked clean and linear often become fragmented.
This is where pipeline visibility becomes critical. If your pipeline view cannot distinguish between funded work, delayed work, and reshaped work, leadership will struggle to make informed decisions. CRs expose weak pipeline hygiene quickly.
An Increase in Forecasting Risk
From an executive perspective, the biggest challenge of a Continuing Resolution is forecasting accuracy. Probabilities assigned during a stable funding environment often become inflated once a CR is in place.
Deals that were highly likely in September may now be uncertain in November. Opportunities with strong technical fit may stall due to funding mechanics unrelated to performance or value. Without adjusting probabilities and timelines, revenue projections drift away from reality.
This is why CR periods require active pipeline management, not passive monitoring. Forecasts must be revisited, assumptions challenged, and optimism tempered with evidence.
The Importance of Capture Discipline
Firms with loose capture processes often react by bidding more aggressively, hoping volume will offset uncertainty. This usually backfires, increasing B&P spend while win rates decline. Proposal teams get stretched thin, and leadership loses confidence in the pipeline.
More disciplined organizations respond differently. They slow down early capture activity, revisit win strategies, and apply stricter gate reviews. Weak opportunities are paused or killed sooner. Strong ones receive deeper attention.
The Importance of Data-Backed Prioritization
During a CR, intuition alone is not enough. Historical patterns matter more than ever. Understanding which agencies continue to award under CRs, which contract types move forward, and which deal characteristics correlate with past wins becomes a strategic advantage.
Historical data is particularly important when capture teams are deciding where to invest limited time and budget. The cost of a bad pursuit decision rises during periods of uncertainty.
Executive Visibility Cannot Be Delayed
In a Continuing Resolution environment, leadership visibility is not optional. Executives need to see more than a static pipeline list. They need insight into risk, funding certainty, timing shifts, and deal quality. Without this, strategic decisions are made on incomplete information.
CRs compress decision windows. When clarity arrives, it often arrives quickly. Firms that already understand their pipeline position can act immediately. Others scramble to catch up.
Turning CR Uncertainty Into Strategic Advantage
While CRs create frustration, they also create opportunity. Many competitors hesitate, slow down, or continue operating on outdated assumptions. Contractors that actively recalibrate their pipeline emerge stronger.
By prioritizing funded work, tightening capture discipline, and aligning leadership around a realistic forecast, firms can maintain momentum even in uncertain fiscal conditions. When full-year appropriations are finally passed, these organizations are positioned to accelerate, not recover.
How CaptureExec(™) ?? BIT Solutions LLC Supports Smarter Pipeline Management During CRs
Navigating a Continuing Resolution requires more than awareness. It requires visibility, discipline, and confidence in your data.
BIT Solutions LLC delivers CaptureExec, an AI-powered capture management platform built specifically for government contractors. CaptureExec helps firms adapt quickly when funding conditions shift by providing a clear, centralized view of pipeline reality.
With CaptureExec, GovCon teams can:
- Analyze opportunities using AI-driven winnability and deal-shaping scores
- Track funding status, timelines, and reshaped procurements in one system
- Manage IDIQs and task orders with full historical context
- Run structured gate reviews grounded in data, not optimism
- Provide executives with real-time dashboards for pipeline health and forecast confidence
Unlike generic CRMs, CaptureExec requires no developers, no complex customization, and no added cost for training or integration. It is purpose-built for GovCon teams that need clarity, especially during periods of fiscal uncertainty.
For contractors navigating the 2025 budget environment, the ability to see clearly and act decisively is a competitive advantage. CaptureExec from BIT Solutions LLC helps make that possible. Book a demo today to ensure your pipeline is built to withstand the complexities of the federal budget cycle.
Schedule a Free Demo
Click here to schedule your demo.
